Why CAD Failed in Mammography.
111 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Been Kim
- Martin Wattenberg
- Carrie J. Cai
- Mohit Bansal
- Fernanda B. Viégas
- Michael Terry
- Greg S. Corrado
- Lauren Wilcox
In Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
In Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
Citations in the corpus
- A Human-Centered Evaluation of a Deep Learning System Deployed in Clinics for the Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy (2020, background): “Even systems with widespread adoption, such as CAD in Mammography, have been shown to require a radiologist to do more work, not less, [18] and generally do not improve a radiologist’s diagnostic accuracy [12, 26].”
- "Hello AI": Uncovering the Onboarding Needs of Medical Practitioners for Human-AI Collaborative Decision-Making (2019, background): “Despite the high-performing nature of these algorithms, prior work has shown that CDSSes can be difficult to successfully integrate into practice, citing a lack of HCI consideration as one of the primary reasons for failure [41, 44, 55, 76, 78].”
- Human-Centered Tools for Coping with Imperfect Algorithms During Medical Decision-Making (2019, background): “and trust: experts may resist using a system if it does not provide relevant information or capture the nuances of human thinking [23, 27, 45].”