Pits and pitfalls: taxonomic variability and patterning in tooth mark dimensions

By Colleen Delaney-Rivera, T. Plummer, J. Hodgson, Frances Forrest, F. Hertel, J. S. Oliver. 2009

213 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Anthropology, Archeology, Ecology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0e74c05d9f6dc2ccb2c20628af9c5a3c4e47180b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Anthropology

1. A. Gidna
2. José Yravedra
3. M. Andrés
4. M. Domínguez‐Rodrigo

In Archeology

1. A. Gidna
2. José Yravedra
3. M. Andrés
4. M. Domínguez‐Rodrigo

In Ecology

1. A. Gidna
2. José Yravedra
3. M. Andrés
4. M. Domínguez‐Rodrigo

Citations in the corpus

• Understanding the ancient habitats of the last-interglacial (late MIS 5) Neanderthals of Central Iberia: paleoenvironmental and taphonomic evidence from the Cueva del Camino (Spain) site (2012, methodology): “A: Length in dense cortical; ^Delaney-Rivera et al. (2009); "Saladié et al. (2011). of cases are characterised by being smooth, with a high percentage of crenulated edges in the sample.”
• A study of dimensional differences of tooth marks (pits and scores) on bones modified by small and large carnivores (2012, methodology): “Recently, dimensional data collected from feeding experiments with a wider array of carnivores showed a much greater overlap in tooth pit dimensions irrespective of carnivore size and taxon (Delaney-Rivera et al. 2009).”