Cognitive, physical, sensory, and functional affordances in interaction design

By R. Hartson. Behavior and Information Technology, 2003

728 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Mechanical Engineering, Human-Computer Interaction

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0e693b0dcac042d1845e848ecb45a93324524672

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Andrew Burton-Jones
2. Hiroshi Ishii
3. Kris Luyten
4. Karin Coninx
5. Jo Vermeulen
6. Elise van den Hoven
7. Georges M. Fadel
8. Ana Javornik

In Mechanical Engineering

1. Andrew Burton-Jones
2. Kris Luyten
3. Karin Coninx
4. Jo Vermeulen
5. Elise van den Hoven
6. Georges M. Fadel
7. Ana Javornik
8. Camille Grange

In Human-Computer Interaction

1. Andrew Burton-Jones
2. D. Harrison McKnight
3. Hiroshi Ishii
4. Kris Luyten
5. Karin Coninx
6. Nancy K. Lankton
7. Jo Vermeulen
8. Elise van den Hoven

Citations in the corpus

• Technology, Humanness, and Trust: Rethinking Trust in Technology (2015, background): “An observer first perceives an object’s physical component, which means that the object’s properties must be visible and/or detectable (Gibson, 1977; Hartson, 2003).”
• Crossing the bridge over Norman's Gulf of Execution: revealing feedforward's true identity (2013, methodology): “The need for physical, cognitive, sensory and functional affordances, and the position of feedback and feedforward in Norman’s Stages of Action model (image based on [12], adapted from [22]).”
• inFORM: dynamic physical affordances and constraints through shape and object actuation (2013, background): “, the usefulness of a system function)” [13].”
• From Use to Effective Use: A Representation Theory Perspective (2013, background): “In relation to the pragmatics of representations, it is helpful to link the notion of an affordance (Hartson 2003; Markus and Silver 2008) with the notion of representations.”
• Affordance based design: a relational theory for design (2009, background): “Norman and others have further refined his approach with respect to interaction design [which includes graphical user interfaces (GUIs) as well as human–computer-interaction (HCI) in general] (Gaver 1991; Norman 1999; St. Amant 1999; McGrenere and Ho 2000; Hartson 2003).”
• ‘It’s an illusion, but it looks real!’ Consumer affective, cognitive and behavioural responses to augmented reality applications (2016, methodology): “In the main TIME model, Sundar et al. (2015) emphasises the role of a ff ordances (Hartson, 2003; Norman, 1999) as the action possibilities provided by the technology ’ s features (Sundar et al., 2015; Sundar, Xu, & Dou, 2012).”