Perception of faces, objects, and scenes : analytic and holistic processes
By M. A. Peterson, G. Rhodes. 2006
143 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0e68de3f5d3d5b8affee82d205c57b2aafd78ddc
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- J. Henderson
- Monica S. Castelhano
- Gillian Rhodes
- Antonio Torralba
- A. Hollingworth
- B. Tatler
- Mary M. Hayhoe
- Tim J. Smith
Citations in the corpus
- Are human preferences for facial symmetry focused on signals of developmental instability (2004, background): “People, on theotherhand, are face experts and can make extremely fine discriminations between faces (Kanwisher, 2000; Peterson and Rhodes, 2003) and can detect tiny deviations from perfect symmetry about a vertical axis in complex biological images such as faces (Evans et al., 2000).”
- Incidental visual memory for objects in scenes (2005, background): “…well as the overwhelming evidence that iconic representations are not fused across saccades (Irwin, 1992a, 1992b; Irwin & Andrews, 1996; Pollatsek & Rayner, 1992), Hollingworth and Henderson (2002) proposed a visual memory theory of scene representation (see also Henderson & Hollingworth, 2003c).”