Field research in conflict environments: Methodological challenges and snowball sampling

By N. Cohen, Tamar Arieli. 2011

810 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Epidemiology, Infectious Diseases

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0e54f736049c599286467ee6e2a43cf498840cc1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Katrina J. Charles
2. Julian Kirchherr
3. N. Cohen

In Epidemiology

1. Katrina J. Charles
2. Julian Kirchherr
3. N. Cohen

In Infectious Diseases

1. Julian Kirchherr
2. Katrina J. Charles
3. N. Cohen

Citations in the corpus

• Enhancing the sample diversity of snowball samples: Recommendations from a research project on anti-dam movements in Southeast Asia (2018, positive): “Each sub-population operating in a conflict environment can be considered difficult to reach since fear and mistrust are often pervasive [7].”
• How Culture Affects Street-Level Bureaucrats’ Bending the Rules in the Context of Informal Payments for Health Care: The Israeli Case (2018, methodology): “This method has proven effective in reaching and involving respondents in discussions about sensitive issues (Cohen & Arieli, 2011).”