Affordances can invite behavior: Reconsidering the relationship between affordances and agency

By R. Withagen, H. J. Poel, Duarte Araújo, G. Pepping. 2012

523 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, History and Philosophy of Science, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0e434ee0145736742f5a55958ceda7b95c2dcf72

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Erik Rietveld
2. Duarte Araújo
3. Keith Davids
4. João Carvalho
5. Damiaan Denys
6. Maarten van Westen
7. Julian Kiverstein
8. Robert Hristovski

In History and Philosophy of Science

1. Erik Rietveld
2. Julian Kiverstein

In Social Psychology

1. Keith Davids
2. Duarte Araújo
3. Ludovic Seifert
4. João Carvalho
5. Erik Rietveld
6. Damiaan Denys
7. Maarten van Westen
8. Julian Kiverstein

Citations in the corpus

• Ecological-Enactive Cognition as engaging with a field of relevant affordances (2018, background): “…cognitive science (philosophy, emotion psychology, psychiatry, and radical embodied cognitive neuroscience) but also on decades of research on affordances in the tradition of ecological psychology (Gibson 1979; Heft 2001; Reed 1996; Chemero 2003; Withagen et al. 2012; Withagen et al. 2017).”
• A Rich Landscape of Affordances (2014, background): “Moreover, without this distinction architects and human movement scientists (such as Withagen et al., 2012) interested in designing healthier living environments will not be able to understand why some affordances invite movement and others do not solicit that.”
• Ecological cognition: expert decision-making behaviour in sport (2017, background): “Whether the individual takes up these possibilities or not is a separate matter since affordances are not deterministic causes, i.e. one can decline or accept an invitation to act in a specific way (Withagen et al., 2012, 2017).”
• Understanding phenomenological differences in how affordances solicit action. An exploration (2018, background): “…in whether and how affordances are experienced as soliciting (cf. Frijda 1986; Dreyfus and Kelly 2007; Dreyfus 2007; Heft 2010; Rietveld 2012;Withagen et al. 2012; De Haan et al. 2013, 2015; Rietveld and Kiverstein 2014; Siegel 2014; Dotov and Chemero 2014; Romdenh-Romluc 2014; Withagen et…”
• Effects of manipulations of player numbers vs. field dimensions on inter-individual coordination during small-sided games in youth football (2015, unknown): “These intertwined relations invite actions (Withagen et al., 2012).”