Globalization, polarization and cultural drift
By Konstantin Klemm, Víctor M. Eguíluz, Ra'ul Toral, M. S. Miguel. 2005
228 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0e4134e407826b198ee66fb3f73578856fbb9ad2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
Citations in the corpus
- Assessing the accuracy of the aggregate law of motion in models with heterogeneous agents (2010, unknown): “…that one nds a higher R2, i.e., an improvement in the6 accuracy measure, if the variance of the underlying shocks increases as is the case in7 Krueger and Kubler (2004).8 These drawbacks of the R2 and b u will be documented using Monte Carlo analysis.9 In particular, I give several examples…”
- Statistical physics of social dynamics (2007, unknown): “An approximate evaluation of the relaxation in d = 2 gives T = N ln(N), in good agreement with simulations, while T ∼ N2 on one dimension (Klemm et al., 2005).”
- Understanding Polarization: Meanings, Measures, and Model Evaluation (2017, unknown): “In a series of extensions of the Axelrod model, Klemm et al. (2003a, 2003b, 2003c, 2005) devise a measure for representing the degree to which a population is dominated by one homogeneous culture: the ratio of the largest stable region to the whole.”
- Numerically stable and accurate stochastic simulation approaches for solving dynamic economic models (2011, background): “Christiano and Fisher (2000), and Krueger and Kubler (2004).”
- A Model of the Consumption Response to Fiscal Stimulus Payments (2011, background): “Given the high-frequency OLG structure, solving a version of our two-asset model with aggregate shocks and asset returns determined endogenously is not numerically feasible (see Krueger and Kubler, 2004).”
- Doves for the Rich, Hawks for the Poor? Distributional Consequences of Monetary Policy (2016, background): “The values of targets (iii) and (iv) are taken from Krueger et al. (2015) and capture persistent idiosyncratic shocks to earnings conditional on staying employed.”
- The Pass-Through of Sovereign Risk (2016, methodology): “The collocation points ~S and the set of polynomials T( ) are chosen using the approach of Smolyak (Krueger and Kubler 2004).”