CNES/GRGS 10-day gravity field models (release 2) and their evaluation

By Sean Bruinsma, J. Lemoine, Richard Biancale, N. G. Val’es. 2010

255 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Molecular Biology, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0e35e933aca55d70da16e757535b7198a418436a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

1. C. Sakumura
2. Sean Bruinsma
3. F. LeMoine
4. Srinivas V. Bettadpur

In Molecular Biology

1. John C. Ries
2. Srinivas V. Bettadpur
3. Sean Bruinsma
4. John M. Wahr
5. Byron D. Tapley
6. Isabella Velicogna
7. S. Swenson
8. Clark R. Wilson

In Oceanography

1. John C. Ries
2. Srinivas V. Bettadpur
3. Sean Bruinsma
4. C. Sakumura
5. John M. Wahr
6. Isabella Velicogna
7. Byron D. Tapley
8. S. Swenson

Citations in the corpus

• Ensemble prediction and intercomparison analysis of GRACE time‐variable gravity field models (2014, background): “…Center for Space Research (CSR) [Bettadpur, 2012], NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) [Watkins, 2012], and Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum (GFZ) [Dahle, 2013], as well as the products from CNES/Groupe de Recherches de Géodésie Spatiale (CNES/GRGS) [Bruinsma et al., 2010] outlined in Table 2.”
• Precision Orbit Determination Standards for the Jason Series of Altimeter Missions (2010, methodology): “The GDR gravity model was obtained including only two years of GRACE data between March 2003 and March 2005, while the latest release of the mean gravity field includes data up to September 2007 (Bruinsma et al. 2009).”