Sex‐specific food provisioning in a monomorphic seabird, the common guillemot Uria aalge: nest defence, foraging efficiency or parental effort?

By C. Thaxter, F. Daunt, Kc Hamer, Y. Watanuki, M. Harris, D. Grémillet, G. Peters, Sarah Wanless. 2009

104 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0e2bb1c9b0eaf1f993395745b9624c9958dc0dff

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Citations in the corpus

Potential impacts of wave-powered marine renewable energy installations on marine birds (2010, background): “Sensitivity will also vary as a function of avoidance ability: surface divers have typically slow and controlled dive profiles, whereas plunge-diving species have a lower margin for avoidance and so may be more threatened (Ropert-Coudert et al. 2004, Thaxter et al. 2009).”
Sex-specific foraging behaviour in northern gannets Morus bassanus: incidence and implications (2012, background): “Sex-specific foraging has been described for a number of monomorphic birds, particularly seabirds (Wiggins & Morris 1987, Gray & Hamer 2001, Fraser et al. 2002, Lewis et al. 2002, Thaxter et al. 2009).”
How many seabirds do we need to track to define home-range area? (2013, background): “2010), sexes (Thaxter et al. 2009; Weimerskirch et al. 2009; Quintana et al. 2011) and age classes (Votier et al.”
Sexual segregation in a wide-ranging marine predator is a consequence of habitat selection (2015, background): “…or competitive exclusion by the 58 dominant sex (Phillips et al. 2004) but could, alternatively be a consequence of differing 59 parental roles (Thaxter et al. 2009, Elliot et al. 2010), or differences in the nutritional 60 requirements of males and females as proposed by Lewis et al. (2002).”
Causes and consequences of individual variability and specialization in foraging and migration strategies of seabirds (2017, background): “…chicks increases during later rearing or in the post-fledging period, when males forage closer to the colony, dive longer and deeper per day and are forced to forage at lowerquality prey patches than females (Harding et al. 2004, Thaxter et al. 2009, Elliott et al. 2010, Burke et al. 2015).”
Foraging plasticity in a pelagic seabird species along a marine productivity gradient (2010, methodology): “This software reconstructs flight, swimming or other movements using a dead-reckoning technique (Dall’Antonia et al. 1995, Thaxter et al. 2009).”
Oceanographic characteristics of areas used by Cory’s shearwaters during short and long foraging trips in the North Atlantic (2010, methodology): “This software analyses flight, swim or other movements using a dead-reckoning technique (Dall’Antonia et al. 1995; Thaxter et al. 2009).”
Sexually distinct foraging strategies in an omnivorous seabird (2015, background): “2002) but may for example point at alternative foraging strategies and resource allocation by males and females (Weimerskirch et al. 1997; Clarke et al. 1998; Thaxter et al. 2009).”