The energy balance experiment EBEX-2000. Part II: Intercomparison of eddy-covariance sensors and post-field data processing methods

By Matthias Mauder, Steve Oncley, R. Vogt, T. Weidinger, L. Ribeiro, C. Bernhofer, T. Foken, W. Kohsiek, H. D. Bruin, Heping Liu. 2007

237 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Computational Mechanics, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0e1f4301bacb067b3942d4f05da582849c4068ad

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

1. T. Foken
2. Matthias Mauder
3. E. Bou‐Zeid
4. Zhi-hua Wang

In Computational Mechanics

1. T. Foken
2. Matthias Mauder
3. E. Bou‐Zeid
4. Zhi-hua Wang

In Global and Planetary Change

1. T. Foken
2. Matthias Mauder
3. E. Bou‐Zeid
4. Zhi-hua Wang

Citations in the corpus

• The energy balance closure problem: an overview. (2008, methodology): “In contrast, the energy balance closure for a desert (Unland et al. 1996, Heusinkveld et al. 2004) or the African bush land (Mauder et al. 2007a) is nearly ideal.”
• Quantifying soybean evapotranspiration using an eddy covariance approach (2018, methodology): “…from cropping systems, known as energy balance non-closure problem (EBC), continue to haunt this method, hindering its applications in irrigation water management (Foken et al., 2011; Foken, 2006; Gao et al., 2017; Leuning et al., 2012; Liu et al., 2017; Mauder et al., 2007; Oncley et al., 2007).”