Peer-to-Peer Lenders Versus Banks: Substitutes or Complements?

By Huan Tang. The Review of financial studies, 2019

527 citations recorded by the source corpus.

This paper studies whether, in the consumer credit market, peer-to-peer (P2P) lending platforms serve as substitutes for banks or instead as complements. I develop a conceptual framework and derive testable predictions to distinguish between these two possibilities. Using a regulatory change as an exogenous shock to bank credit supply, I find that P2P lending is a substitute for bank lending in terms of serving infra-marginal bank borrowers yet complements bank lending with respect to small loans. These results indicate that the credit expansion resulting from P2P lending likely occurs only among borrowers who already have access to bank credit.Received June 1, 2017; editorial decision September 15, 2018 by Editor Andrew Karolyi. Authors have furnished an Internet Appendix, which is available on the Oxford University Press Web site next to the link to the final published paper online.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Finance, Management Information Systems

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0e11ff41524369f2c39a3ce0c8bc9f4324777259

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

  1. Feng Zhu
  2. Stijn Claessens
  3. Marco Di Maggio
  4. Jon Frost
  5. Vincent Yao
  6. Thorsten Beck
  7. Asli Demirgüç-Kunt
  8. James B. Ang

In Finance

  1. Feng Zhu
  2. Stijn Claessens
  3. Marco Di Maggio
  4. Vincent Yao
  5. Thorsten Beck
  6. Asli Demirgüç-Kunt
  7. Luc Laeven
  8. María Soledad Martínez Pería

In Management Information Systems

  1. Stijn Claessens
  2. Marco Di Maggio
  3. Jon Frost
  4. Vincent Yao

Citations in the corpus