A class of Wasserstein metrics for probability distributions.
By C. Givens, R. Shortt. 1984
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- José Antonio Carrillo
- Chunyuan Li
- Cédric Villani
- Luigi Ambrosio
- Robert J. McCann
- Giuseppe Savar'e
- Zhe Gan
- Filippo Santambrogio
Citations in the corpus
- Generalized Zero- and Few-Shot Learning via Aligned Variational Autoencoders (2018, methodology): “In the case of multivariate Gaussians, a closed-form solution of the 2-Wasserstein distance [8] between two distributions i and j is given as:”
- Contractions in the 2-Wasserstein Length Space and Thermalization of Granular Media (2006, background): “Here, we have used well-known properties of the Wasserstein distance with respect to weak-∗ limits one can see in e.g. Givens and Shortt [32]: namely, weak-∗ lower semicontinuity in both arguments and continuity when weak-∗ convergence is augmented by convergence of second order moments (5.6).”
- Rethinking Rotated Object Detection with Gaussian Wasserstein Distance Loss (2021, unknown): “(10) This formula interested several works [14, 40, 22, 9].”
- Regret in the Newsvendor Model with Demand and Yield Randomness (2021, unknown): “…balls of the form F ρ ð θ Þ ≜ f ∈ P ð W Þ j d ρ ð , Þ ≤ θ g ; here, for any finite ρ ∈ [1, ∞ ), the type-ρ Wasser-stein distance is defined as It is intuitive that the type-ρ Wasserstein distance converges to the type-∞ Wasserstein distance as ρ approaches infinity (Givens and Shortt 1984).”
- The derivation of swarming models: Mean-field limit and Wasserstein distances (2013, background): “The set of probability measures with bounded moments of order p , denoted by P p ( R d ), 1 ≤ p < ∞ , is a complete metric space endowed with the p -Wassertein distance d p , see [80]. to We refer [41, 61] for more details in the case of the d ∞ distance.”
- A spectral notion of Gromov–Wasserstein distance and related methods (2011, background): “These distances are known as Wasserstein–Kantorovich–Rubinstein distances between measures [56,59,60].”
- A Convexity Principle for Interacting Gases (1997, background): “3 shows that only one can be positive; it is 4= 7(1) 2 1 (7 1 2 1 707 1 2 1 ) &1 2 7(1) 2 1 , as has previously been noted by several authors [7, 18, 9, 11].”
- Wasserstein Distributionally Robust Optimization: Theory and Applications in Machine Learning (2019, background): “In its between normal distributions has been discovered earlier in [30, 43, 72].”
- Statistical Aspects of Wasserstein Distances (2018, background): “For the Gaussian case, see Olkin & Pukelsheim (1982) or Givens & Shortt (1984) in finite dimensions, and Gelbrich (1990) and Cuesta-Albertos et al. (1996) for an infinite-dimensional extension.”
- Optimal-order bounds on the rate of convergence to normality in the multivariate delta method (2009, background): “[49, 16, 23] (as noted by Dudley in his review MR0752258 on MathSciNet, the normality assumption is not actually needed there).”
- THE GEOMETRY OF DISSIPATIVE EVOLUTION EQUATIONS: THE POROUS MEDIUM EQUATION (2001, background): “We found the few results on d we need in [41] or [27].”
- Scenario tree modeling for multistage stochastic programs (2009, background): “and sometimes also called Wasserstein metrics of order r [9].”
- t-Closeness: Privacy Beyond k-Anonymity and l-Diversity (2007, background): “This requirement leads us to the the Earth Mover’s distance (EMD) [14], which is actually a Monge-Kantorovich transportation distance [5] in disguise.”