Molecular strategies of plant defense and insect counter‐defense

By K. Zhu‐Salzman, J. Bi, Tong‐Xian Liu. 2005

87 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Insect Science, Molecular Biology, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0e0553e6686597de16369634991693199f25296c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Insect Science

1. L. Walling
2. E. Haubruge
3. Marie-Laure Fauconnier
4. F. Verheggen
5. R. Karban
6. G. Howe

In Molecular Biology

1. L. Walling

In Plant Science

1. L. Walling
2. L. Kempema
3. Sonia I. Zarate
4. E. Haubruge
5. Marie-Laure Fauconnier
6. F. Verheggen

Citations in the corpus

• Role of terpenes from aphid‐infested potato on searching and oviposition behavior of Episyrphus balteatus (2007, background): “Attacks from phloem-feeding aphids elicit weak responses in contrast to tissue-feeding lepidopteran larvae and mesophyl-sucking insects (Voelckel et al., 2004; De Vos et al., 2005; Zhu-Salzman et al., 2005).”
• Silverleaf Whitefly Induces Salicylic Acid Defenses and Suppresses Effectual Jasmonic Acid Defenses1[W][OA] (2006, background): “Additional evidence for herbivore manipulation of plant defenses (the ‘‘decoy’’ hypothesis) to enhance insect performance is accumulating from studies with both tissue-damaging herbivores and phloem-feeding aphids (Zhu-Salzman et al., 2005; Thompson and Goggin, 2006).”