The slice filtration and mixed Tate motives

By A. Huber, B. Kahn. Compositio Mathematica, 2006

86 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0deb410d9a3908c5f0586e52042da7717f9038e0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Geometry and Topology

1. M. Bondarko
2. B. Totaro
3. M. Levine
4. Markus Spitzweck
5. Sam Payne
6. O. Rondigs
7. Max Lieblich
8. Frédéric Déglise

In Mathematical Physics

1. B. Totaro
2. M. Levine
3. M. Bondarko
4. Markus Spitzweck
5. O. Rondigs
6. Sam Payne
7. P. Ostvaer
8. Y. Félix

Citations in the corpus

• CHOW GROUPS, CHOW COHOMOLOGY, AND LINEAR VARIETIES (2014, background): “I also added some papers to the bibliography which refer to the preprint version of this paper, and which develop the ideas further [7, 10, 14, 17, 23].”
• The homotopy coniveau tower (2005, background): “In fact, the motives πµp E are birational motives in the sense of Kahn–Sujatha [10] (see also [7] and Remark 11.2.3).”
• Differential graded motives: weight complex, weight filtrations and spectral sequences for realizations; Voevodsky versus Hanamura (2006, background): “For rational coefficients (ii) was proved in Appendix B of [22]: it suffices to note that if there exists an étale finite morphism U → V for smooth U , V then Mgm(V )⊗Q is a direct summand of Mgm(U) ⊗ Q.”