THE CONTOUR OF SPLITTING TREES IS A LÉVY PROCESS

By Amaury Lambert. 2007

125 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Splitting trees are those random trees where individuals give birth at a constant rate during a lifetime with general distribution, to i.i.d. copies of themselves. The width process of a splitting tree is then a binary, homogeneous Crump-Mode-Jagers (CMJ) process, and is not Markovian unless the lifetime distribution is exponential (or a Dirac mass at {∞}). Here, we allow the birth rate to be infinite, that is, pairs of birth times and life spans of newboms form a Poisson point process along the lifetime of their mother, with possibly infinite intensity measure. A splitting tree is a random (so-called) chronological tree. Each element of a chronological tree is a (so-called) existence point (ν, τ) of some individual ν (vertex) in a discrete tree where τ is a nonnegative real number called chronological level (time). We introduce a total order on existence points, called linear order, and a mapping ϕ from the tree into the real line which preserves this order. The inverse of ϕ is called the exploration process, and the projection of this inverse on chronological levels the contour process. For splitting trees truncated up to level r, we prove that a thus defined contour process is a Levy process reflected below τ and killed upon hitting 0. This allows one to derive properties of (i) splitting trees: conceptual proof of Le Gall-Le Jan's theorem in the finite variation case, exceptional points, coalescent point process and age distribution; (ii) CMJ processes: one-dimensional marginals, conditionings, limit theorems and asymptotic numbers of individuals with infinite versus finite descendances.

Subfields: Condensed Matter Physics, Management Science and Operations Research, Mathematical Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0de1a911dae15b4e1e083c5fb3e20e11511eaf54

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Condensed Matter Physics

  1. S. Johnston
  2. Simon C. Harris
  3. Matthew I. Roberts

In Management Science and Operations Research

  1. Simon C. Harris
  2. S. Johnston
  3. Matthew I. Roberts
  4. Zhan Shi

In Mathematical Physics

  1. Simon C. Harris
  2. S. Johnston
  3. Matthew I. Roberts
  4. Zhan Shi

Citations in the corpus