Conservation‐reliant species and the future of conservation

By J. M. Scott, D. Goble, Aaron M. Haines, John J. Wiens, M. Neel. 2010

228 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0ddcb44807e3b94d207555ff7a658b2b560a29dc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

1. Aaron M. Haines
2. Allison K. Leidner
3. M. Neel

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. M. Neel

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Aaron M. Haines
2. Allison K. Leidner
3. M. Neel

Citations in the corpus

• By the Numbers: How is Recovery Defined by the US Endangered Species Act? (2012, background): “At these abundances, the prospects for establishing self-sustaining populations are poor, and ongoing management for the foreseeable future is likely, regardless of threat abatement (Scott et al. 2010).”
• Reintroduction objectives, decisions and outcomes: global perspectives from the herpetofauna (2014, unknown): “…1998; Griffith et al., 1989) and that post-release monitoring is often lacking and unfocused (Scott & Carpenter, 1987; Dodd & Seigel, 1991; Seddon, 1999; Fischer & Lindenmayer, 2000; Seigel & Dodd, 2000; Ewen & Armstrong, 2007; Armstrong & Seddon, 2008; Scott et al., 2010; Sutherland et al., 2010).”