Dynamic biogeography and conservation of endangered species
By R. Channell, Mark V. Lomolino. Nature, 2000
626 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0dd27d34fec99c7f8ce545e455280af52726f597
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecological Modeling
- Miguel B. Araújo
- M. Boyce
- Wilfried Thuiller
- Mark Hebblewhite
- Scott E. Nielsen
- D. H. Reed
- R. Frankham
- Christopher M Thomas
In Ecology
- M. Boyce
- D. H. Reed
- D. Sax
- R. Frankham
- Mark Hebblewhite
- Kevin J. Gaston
- Miguel B. Araújo
- Barry W. Brook
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Miguel B. Araújo
- M. Boyce
- Wilfried Thuiller
- D. Sax
- Kevin J. Gaston
- Mark Hebblewhite
- C. Eckert
- K. Bjorndal
Citations in the corpus
- The genetic rescue of the Florida panther (2006, background): “Moreover, studies of range shrinkage demonstrate that human actions typically force a species to retreat to what was once the edge of its range, apparently specializing in habitats that are not likely to be optimal (Channell & Lomolino, 2000).”
- The community context of species' borders: ecological and evolutionary perspectives (2005, positive): “The interesting observation that when species experience decline, many persist in the periphery of their historical geographic range, but not the core (Brooks 2000, Channell and Lomolino 2000), suggests these populations may retain adaptive potential.”
- Effects of marginality on plant population performance (2014, background): “We did not consider studies dealing with genetics only [see Channell & Lomolino (2000), Channell (2004) and Eckert et al. (2008) for a comprehensive insight on this topic] or studies where a species’ native range was compared to the area where a species had been introduced.”
- Species' borders: A unifying theme in ecology (2005, positive): “…(Parmesan and Yohe 2003, Root et al. 2003), or predicting the extent of impact of introduced species (Peterson 2003), or assessing the impact of land use change on the distribution of endangered species (Channell and Lomolino 2000), lead naturally to a close scrutiny of processes at range margins.”
- Capturing biodiversity: selecting priority areas for conservation using different criteria (2005, background): “The protection of a wide span of environmental variation may also ensure the long-term persistence of species by allowing adaptive response to future change (Channell and Lomolino 2000; Smith et al. 2001; but see Araujo 2002).”
- Genetic variation across species’ geographical ranges: the central–marginal hypothesis and beyond (2008, background): “…substantial genetic variation, they may adaptively diverge from more central populations owing to different selective pressures and reduced gene flow (Lenormand 2002) and may therefore play a role in the maintenance and generation of biological diversity (Mayr 1970; Channell & Lomolino 2000).”
- Combining resource selection and movement behavior to predict corridors for Canada lynx at their southern range periphery (2013, background): “…the periphery of species’ ranges are important for long-term conservation due to a greater potential for speciation and potentially greater survivorship than core populations when species experience sharp range contractions (Lesica and Allendorf, 1995; Channell and Lomolino, 2000; Carroll, 2007).”