PREDATORS COME AND PREDATORS GO: THE REVERSIBILITY OF PREDATOR‐INDUCED TRAITS

220 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Temporal variability, threat sensitivity and conflicting information about the nature of risk: understanding the dynamics of tadpole antipredator behaviour (2009, unknown): “A common finding is that tadpoles show graded behavioural responses with increasing levels of risk (Van Buskirk et al. 2002; Relyea 2003a; Laurila et al. 2004; Hammond et al. 2007).”
Predator-induced changes in morphology of a prey fish: the effects of food level and temporal frequency of predation risk (2008, background): “For tadpoles, Relyea (2003) showed that changes in tail depth, and body depth were highly reversible early in ontogeny but less reversible later in ontogeny.”
Evolutionary Biology of Animal Cognition (2004, background): “The reduced use of antipredatory behaviors probably reflected their high cost in terms of reduced feeding and growth rate and perhaps the increased effectiveness of the antipredatory morphology (Relyea 2003).”
Re-evaluating the costs and limits of adaptive phenotypic plasticity (2010, background): “However, it is clear that the timing of exposure to environmental cues can affect an organism's ability to respond to multiple environmental variables simultaneously (e.g. Weinig & Delph 2001; Relyea 2003; Cipollini 2004).”