Fundamentals of Modern Statistical Methods
By Rand R. Wilcox. 2001
280 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0db7191d89a12bfd909e898e3939a0f52112307b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Statistics and Probability
- David M Erceg-Hurn
- Vikki M Mirosevich
- F. J. Diaz
- J. de León
- Benoît Monin
- Daniel M. Oppenheimer
- C. Zygmont
- Mario R. Smith
Citations in the corpus
- A meta-analysis of worldwide studies demonstrates an association between schizophrenia and tobacco smoking behaviors. (2005, methodology): “Schizophrenia sample sizes were used as weights (Wilcox, 2001).”
- Modern robust statistical methods: an easy way to maximize the accuracy and power of your research. (2008, background): “Several prominent statisticians and researchers have described the use of classic parametric statistics in the face of assumption violations as invalid (e.g., Kezelman et al., 1998; Leech & Onwuegbuzie, 2002; Wilcox, 2001; Zimmerman, 1998).”
- The retrospective gambler’s fallacy: Unlikely events, constructing the past, and multiple universes (2009, background): “…found that the contrast for version was highly significant, t = 2.7, p MCMC .005 — participants estimated a larger number of prior trials when they received the rare version than when they received a common version (see Table 1 for by-item means, medians, and 20% trimmed means — Wilcox, 2001 ).”