Study of water sorption, solubility and modulus of elasticity of light-cured dimethacrylate-based dental resins.

By Irini D. Sideridou, V. Tserki, G. Papanastasiou. Biomaterials, 2003

679 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Dentistry, Organic Chemistry, Orthodontics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0db45c7f737831aa67c5b3a9e517b3c22bc69777

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organic Chemistry

1. C. Bowman
2. N. Cramer
3. J. Stansbury
4. A. Lowe

In Orthodontics

1. C. Bowman
2. N. Cramer
3. J. Stansbury

Citations in the corpus

• Hygroscopic and hydrolytic effects in dental polymer networks. (2006, background): “Studies have shown water sorption to be greater for BisGMA-based resins compared to urethane resins [35], and lowest for ethoxylated Bis-GMA (Bis-EMA) resins that do not contain the hydroxyl groups of Bis-GMA or the urethane linkages of UDMA [36].”
• Recent Advances and Developments in Composite Dental Restorative Materials (2011, background): “Numerous investigations are being and have been conducted to evaluate various combinations of these dimethacrylate materials, in efforts to understand the interrelationships among composition, resin viscosity, conversion, shrinkage, flexural strength, fracture toughness, water sorption and solubilit”
• Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. (2007, background): “Nevertheless, some water sorption is inevitable due to the polar ether-linkages and/or hydroxyl groups [18,89].”
• Effects of resin hydrophilicity on water sorption and changes in modulus of elasticity. (2005, positive): “[25] recently reported that the water sorption at equilibrium for poly(Bis-EMA), poly(Bis-GMA), poly(UDMA), and poly(TEGDMA) were 1.”