Meta-analysis of functional outcomes and complications following transurethral procedures for lower urinary tract symptoms resulting from benign prostatic enlargement.
By S. Ahyai, P. Gilling, S. Kaplan, R. Kuntz, S. Madersbacher, F. Montorsi, M. Speakman, C. Stief. European Urology, 2010
617 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Rheumatology, Urology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0d8664b52c9bbf891b4f0793f0cb15b4217fa538
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- J. Cornu
- A. Bachmann
- C. Gratzke
- M. Oelke
- S. Ahyai
- A. Descazeaud
- J. de la Rosette
- P. Gilling
Citations in the corpus
- EAU guidelines on the treatment and follow-up of non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms including benign prostatic obstruction. (2013, background): “In a recent analysis of 20 contemporary RCTs published between 2005 and 2009 and a maximum follow-up of 5 yr, TURP resulted in a substantial improvement of mean Qmax (+162%) and a significant reduction of mean IPSS ( 70%), mean QoL scores ( 69%), and mean PVR urine ( 77%) [80].”
- A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Functional Outcomes and Complications Following Transurethral Procedures for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Resulting from Benign Prostatic Obstruction: An Update. (2015, background): “In the past 2 decades, a wide range of innovative transurethral procedures have challenged the supremacy of the two standard surgical options (monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate [M-TURP] and open prostatectomy [OP]) [2].”