Second-order Convex Splitting Schemes for Gradient Flows with Ehrlich-Schwoebel Type Energy: Application to Thin Film Epitaxy
By Jie Shen, Cheng Wang, Xiaoming Wang, Steven M. Wise. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 2012
442 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computational Mechanics, Condensed Matter Physics, Materials Chemistry
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0d84f5612dec1f01caa7ab79190a7fa1d5cb847c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computational Mechanics
In Condensed Matter Physics
In Materials Chemistry
Citations in the corpus
- Solving Allen-Cahn and Cahn-Hilliard Equations using the Adaptive Physics Informed Neural Networks (2020, background): “Here is some literature that attracts our attention [9, 10, 16, 26, 27, 30, 31].”
- A New Class of Efficient and Robust Energy Stable Schemes for Gradient Flows (2017, unknown): “While it is possible to construct second-order convex splitting schemes for certain situations on a case by case basis (see, for instance, [67, 10, 72]), a general formulation of second-order convex splitting schemes is not available.”
- A Second-Order Energy Stable BDF Numerical Scheme for the Cahn-Hilliard Equation (2018, background): “See the related works for the phase field crystal (PFC) equation and the modified phase field crystal (MPFC) equation [3, 4, 28, 35, 37]; epitaxial thin film growth models [8, 10, 32, 34]; non-local Cahn-Hilliard-type models [22, 23]; the CHHS and related models [9, 13, 20, 36]; et cetera.”
- A novel linear second order unconditionally energy stable scheme for a hydrodynamic Q-tensor model of liquid crystals (2017, methodology): “About the standard analysis technique when the space discretization is involved, we refer to [35,33].”
- Numerical approximations for the molecular beam epitaxial growth model based on the invariant energy quadratization method (2017, background): “[3, 10, 27, 37]), where the convex part of the potential is treated implicitly while the concave part is treated explicitly.”