COEXISTENCE: HOW TO IDENTIFY TROPHIC TRADE-OFFS

By James S. Clark, J. Mohan, M. Dietze, I. Ibáñez. 2003

111 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0d67a7af2256d4f3dfc8c65dcb3e70d04241f2ac

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Plant–soil feedback links negative distance dependence and light gradient partitioning during seedling establishment (2013, background): “…ts This is a specialized form of resource-based niche partitioning (Denslow 1980), which results in no species being competitively dominant across all resource conditions, but rather each species dominates at a given level within the light gradient of the forest (Kobe 1999, Clark et al. 2003).”
Spatial and interspecific variability in phenological responses to warming temperatures (2009, methodology): “To deal with the uncertainty in the temperature data, where the records were only approximations of the true conditions that affected the individuals, we followed a hierarchical Bayesian approach (Clark et al., 2003).”
Why environmental scientists are becoming Bayesians (2004, methodology): “…latent variables), pðparametersjmodel,dataÞ/ pðdatajprocess,data parametersÞ pðprocessjprocess parametersÞ pðall parametersÞ This decomposition comes from Berliner (1996), and has been adopted in a number of recent applications (Wikle et al. 2001; Clark et al. 2003, 2004; Clark 2003; Wikle 2003a).”
Irradiance and oak seedling survival and growth in a heterogeneous environment (2007, background): “We argue that, as a rule, irradiance is highly correlated with temperature and water content (Clark et al., 2003), so our conclusions do not reject these other ideas.”
High‐dimensional coexistence based on individual variation: a synthesis of evidence (2010, background): “This occurs when individuals within a species are responding to unobserved variables, which can be inferred only if there are individual-level data (Clark et al. 2003, 2004).”
The Ecological Niche: History and Recent Controversies (2015, background): “The word trade-off itself is ambiguous, as trade-offs can theoretically produce both equalizing and/or stabilizing effects (Chesson 2000 : 346–347), be they trophic (e.g. Clark et al. 2003 ) or life-history trade-offs (e.g. Clark et al. 2004 ).”
Capturing diversity and interspecific variability in allometries: A hierarchical approach (2008, methodology): “Using such growth data, Bayesian hierarchical models provide a clear and formal method for separating individual effects from measurement error ( Clark et al., 2003, 2004 ).”
EXPLOITING TEMPORAL VARIABILITY TO UNDERSTAND TREE RECRUITMENT RESPONSE TO CLIMATE CHANGE (2007, methodology): “Interannual variation has long been used to analyze climate regulation of tree growth (Graumlich 1991, Clark et al. 2003a, Stevens et al. 2006) and fecundity (McKone et al. 1998, Schauber et al. 2002, Hampe 2005, Mutke et al. 2005).”
POPULATION TIME SERIES: PROCESS VARIABILITY, OBSERVATION ERRORS, MISSING VALUES, LAGS, AND HIDDEN STATES (2004, methodology): “Previous ecological applications of MCMC for simulation of Bayesian posteriors include Bjørnstad et al. (1999), Millar and Meyer (2000), Calder et al. (2003), Clark et al. (2003, 2004), Stenseth et al. (2003), and Wikle (2003).”
QUANTILE REGRESSION REVEALS HIDDEN BIAS AND UNCERTAINTY IN HABITAT MODELS (2005, background): “…e.g., densitydependent competition in plants (Cade and Guo 2000), plant productivity vs. diversity (Huston et al. 2000, Grace 2001, Huston and McBride 2002, Schmid 2002), resource–consumer interactions (Clark et al. 2003), and regional vs. local community organization (Angermeier and Winston 1998).”
FERN COMMUNITY ASSEMBLY: THE ROLES OF CHANCE AND THE ENVIRONMENT AT LOCAL AND INTERMEDIATE SCALES (2005, background): “This variation may be due to stochastic effects, including variation in both the environment and within species, and also to sampling error in each of the surveys (Clark et al. 2003).”