Aiming to Know You Better Perhaps Makes Me a More Engaging Dialogue Partner
By Yury Zemlyanskiy, Fei Sha. 2018
20 citations recorded by the source corpus.
There have been several attempts to define a plausible motivation for a chit-chat dialogue agent that can lead to engaging conversations. In this work, we explore a new direction where the agent specifically focuses on discovering information about its interlocutor. We formalize this approach by defining a quantitative metric. We propose an algorithm for the agent to maximize it. We validate the idea with human evaluation where our system outperforms various baselines. We demonstrate that the metric indeed correlates with the human judgments of engagingness.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Natural Language Processing
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Pascale Fung
- Andrea Madotto
- Zhaojiang Lin
- Jason Aaron Edward Weston
- Chien-Sheng Wu
- Richard Socher
- Kyunghyun Cho
- Caiming Xiong
In Natural Language Processing
- Pascale Fung
- Andrea Madotto
- Jason Aaron Edward Weston
- Kyunghyun Cho
- Chien-Sheng Wu
- Zhaojiang Lin
- Richard Socher
- Ilia Kulikov
Citations in the corpus
- Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generation (2022, background): “PersonaChat datasets [30, 211] accelerate the research on persona consistency [68, 88, 118, 192, 202, 207, 214].”
- Importance of Search and Evaluation Strategies in Neural Dialogue Modeling (2018, background): “Some are more generous while others are quite harsh, as recently reported in Zhang et al. (2018); Zemlyanskiy and Sha (2018).”
- You Impress Me: Dialogue Generation via Mutual Persona Perception (2020, background): “More recently, under the topic of dialogue per-sonalizing, Zemlyanskiy and Sha (2018) proposed a post-processing method to re-rank candidates generated by beam search, while Olabiyi et al. (2019) employed adversarial approaches to solve the consistency problem on interlocutors’ names.”
- Importance of a Search Strategy in Neural Dialogue Modelling (2018, background): “Some annotators are more generous while others are quite harsh, leading the naive average score to have very high variance; for example, as recently reported in (Zhang et al., 2018; Zemlyanskiy and Sha, 2018).”
- Personalizing Dialogue Agents via Meta-Learning (2019, background): “Several works improved on the initial baselines with various methodologies (Kulikov et al., 2018; Yavuz et al.; Hancock et al., 2019; Lucas et al., 2009; Joshi et al., 2017; Zemlyanskiy and Sha, 2018; Gao et al., 2018).”