Reconfigurable system for automated optimization of diverse chemical reactions

By Anne-Catherine Bédard, A. Adamo, Kosi C. Aroh, M. G. Russell, Aaron A. Bedermann, Jeremy Torosian, Brian Yue, Klavs F. Jensen, T. Jamison. Science, 2018

365 citations recorded by the source corpus.

A self-optimizing reactor Chemists spend a great deal of time tweaking the conditions of known reactions. Small changes to temperature and concentration can have a big influence over product yield. Bédard et al. present a flow-based reaction platform that carries out this laborious task automatically. By using feedback from integrated analytics, the system converges on optimal conditions that can then be applied with high precision afterward. A series of modules with heating, cooling, mixing, and photochemical capabilities could be configured for a broad range of reactions. These include homogeneous and heterogeneous palladium-catalyzed cross-coupling, reductive amination, and the generation of sensitive intermediates under an inert atmosphere. Science, this issue p. 1220 A modular flow-based system uses real-time feedback to optimize conditions for reactions widely used in organic chemistry. Chemical synthesis generally requires labor-intensive, sometimes tedious trial-and-error optimization of reaction conditions. Here, we describe a plug-and-play, continuous-flow chemical synthesis system that mitigates this challenge with an integrated combination of hardware, software, and analytics. The system software controls the user-selected reagents and unit operations (reactors and separators), processes reaction analytics (high-performance liquid chromatography, mass spectrometry, vibrational spectroscopy), and conducts automated optimizations. The capabilities of this system are demonstrated in high-yielding implementations of C-C and C-N cross-coupling, olefination, reductive amination, nucleophilic aromatic substitution (SNAr), photoredox catalysis, and a multistep sequence. The graphical user interface enables users to initiate optimizations, monitor progress remotely, and analyze results. Subsequent users of an optimized procedure need only download an electronic file, comparable to a smartphone application, to implement the protocol on their own apparatus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0d447e6b854ff55ce06f7a9d95459e93d6a5be80

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

  1. Petra Schneider
  2. Connor W. Coley
  3. Gisbert Schneider
  4. Stefano Ermon
  5. Mario Krenn
  6. Roderick E. Hubbard

In Materials Chemistry

  1. Gisbert Schneider
  2. Florian Hase
  3. Connor W. Coley
  4. Pascal Friederich
  5. Alán Aspuru-Guzik
  6. Richard D. Braatz
  7. Aditya Grover
  8. Luke Rogers

In Molecular Biology

  1. Gisbert Schneider
  2. Petra Schneider
  3. Alán Aspuru-Guzik
  4. Stefano Ermon
  5. Connor W. Coley
  6. W. Patrick Walters
  7. Richard D. Braatz
  8. Jennifer Listgarten

Citations in the corpus