Agri‐environmental externalities: a framework for designing targeted policies

By J. Lankoski, M. Ollikainen. 2003

151 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Environmental Chemistry, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0d3524391556b4e243efb653e1afb39be15db010

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. S. Chabé-Ferret
2. Konrad Kellermann
3. Mark V. Brady
4. L. Jelínek
5. C. Sahrbacher
6. J. Subervie

In Environmental Chemistry

1. C. Sahrbacher
2. S. Chabé-Ferret
3. Konrad Kellermann
4. J. Subervie

In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

1. C. Sahrbacher
2. S. Chabé-Ferret
3. Konrad Kellermann
4. J. Subervie
5. Thomas Berger

Citations in the corpus

• How much green for the buck? Estimating additional and windfall effects of French agro-environmental schemes by DID-matching (2010, methodology): “Following Lankoski and Ollikainen [20], we thus use an estimate provided by Vehkasalo [36] who approximated the social benefits of reducing nitrogen runoffs from Finnish farmland by applying the avoided expenditure method.”
• Impacts of Decoupled Agricultural Support on Farm Structure, Biodiversity and Landscape Mosaic: Some EU Results (2009, result): “A number of studies are similar to ours in that they attempt to evaluate the impacts of decoupling on landscape values (Lankoski and Ollikainen, 2003; Miettinen et al., 2004).”