The PROSITE database, its status in 2002

1,505 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Re-annotation of the genome sequence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv. (2002, methodology): “Additional functional insight was obtained by using the PROSITE database ( Falquet et al., 2002 ) and the programs tmhmm 1.0 (Sonnhammer et al., 1998) and signalp (Nielsen et al., 1997) to predict subcellular localization.”
ELM server: a new resource for investigating short functional sites in modular eukaryotic proteins (2003, background): “The PROSITE database has collected a number of linear protein motifs, representing them as regular expression patterns (5).”
The Arabidopsis CDPK-SnRK Superfamily of Protein Kinases (2003, background): “…at http://expasy.cbr.nrc.ca/tools/pi_tool.html. c Myristoylation motifs were predicted by PROSITE and from published myristoylation consensus sequences (Towler et al., 1988; Boutin, 1997; Hofmann et al., 1999; Falquet et al., 2002). d Additional information is available at http://plantsp.sdsc.edu.”
The importance of intrinsic disorder for protein phosphorylation. (2004, result): “While our approach does not yield sequence patterns for the substrates of specific kinases, there are clear relationships between our results and those in the PROSITE database ( 48 ) for several kinases.”