Ramucirumab versus placebo as second-line treatment in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma following first-line therapy with sorafenib (REACH): a randomised, double-blind, multicentre,…
By Andrew X. Zhu, Joon-Oh Park, B. Ryoo, C. Yen, R. Poon, D. Pastorelli, J. Blanc, H. Chung, A. Baron, T. Pfiffer and 10 more. The Lancet Oncology, 2015
754 citations recorded by the source corpus.
BACKGROUND VEGF and VEGF receptor-2-mediated angiogenesis contribute to hepatocellular carcinoma pathogenesis. Ramucirumab is a recombinant IgG1 monoclonal antibody and VEGF receptor-2 antagonist. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of ramucirumab in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma following first-line therapy with sorafenib. METHODS In this randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3 trial (REACH), patients were enrolled from 154 centres in 27 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, had hepatocellular carcinoma with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C disease or stage B disease that was refractory or not amenable to locoregional therapy, had Child-Pugh A liver disease, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, had previously received sorafenib (stopped because of progression or intolerance), and had adequate haematological and biochemical parameters. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive intravenous ramucirumab (8 mg/kg) or placebo every 2 weeks, plus best supportive care, until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or death. Randomisation was stratified by geographic region and cause of liver disease with a stratified permuted block method. Patients, medical staff, investigators, and the funder were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01140347. FINDINGS Between Nov 4, 2010, and April 18, 2013, 565 patients were enrolled, of whom 283 were assigned to ramucirumab and 282 were assigned to placebo. Median overall survival for the ramucirumab group was 9·2 months (95% CI 8·0-10·6) versus 7·6 months (6·0-9·3) for the placebo group (HR 0·87 [95% CI 0·72-1·05]; p=0·14). Grade 3 or greater adverse events occurring in 5% or more of patients in either treatment group were ascites (13 [5%] of 277 patients treated with ramucirumab vs 11 [4%] of 276 patients treated with placebo), hypertension (34 [12%] vs ten [4%]), asthenia (14 [5%] vs five [2%]), malignant neoplasm progression (18 [6%] vs 11 [4%]), increased aspartate aminotransferase concentration (15 [5%] vs 23 [8%]), thrombocytopenia (13 [5%] vs one [<1%]), hyperbilirubinaemia (three [1%] vs 13 [5%]), and increased blood bilirubin (five [2%] vs 14 [5%]). The most frequently reported (≥1%) treatment-emergent serious adverse event of any grade or grade 3 or more was malignant neoplasm progression. INTERPRETATION Second-line treatment with ramucirumab did not significantly improve survival over placebo in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. No new safety signals were noted in eligible patients and the safety profile is manageable. FUNDING Eli Lilly and Co.
Subfields: Hepatology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0d19db5c2f108b7fa0b0691129e2bb953bf404d0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Hepatology
- J. Llovet
- V. Mazzaferro
- Alejandro Forner1 , 2
- Peter R. Galle
- L. Kulik
- Amit G. Singal
- F. Piscaglia
- J. Raoul
In Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Citations in the corpus
- Asia–Pacific clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: a 2017 update (2017, background): “In addition to sorafenib and regorafenib, a variety of molecular targeted agents have been thoroughly investigated, including sunitinib [589], brivanib [590, 591], linifanib [592], ramucirumab (angiogenesis inhibitors) [593], erlotinib (EGFR inhibitor) [594], and everolimus (mTOR inhibitor) [595].”
- Global trends in hepatocellular carcinoma epidemiology: implications for screening, prevention and therapy (2023, background): “…regorafenib 180 and cabozantinib 181 , as well as the anti-VEGFR2 monoclonal antibody ramucirumab have each been demonstrated to improve OS relative to placebo in phase III trials, although the benefit of ramucirumab was restricted to those with serum AFP levels >400 ng/ml at baseline 182 .”
- AASLD Practice Guidance on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (2023, positive): “[330] In subgroup analysis, a benefit of ramucirumab for patients with AFP ≥ 400 ng/ml was noted, which was confirmed in the subsequent REACH-2 study evaluating ramucirumab in the subgroup of patients with AFP ≥ 400, although the absolute OS benefit was modest.”
- EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. (2018, methodology): “Elevated AFP levels have been shown to predict risk of tumour recurrence after resection,(281,282) risk of drop-out in patients on the waiting list for liver transplantation, survival and risk of tumour recurrence after liver transplantation, response to loco-regional therapies, 293 and survival in ”