Elements of Risk in Qualitative Research

By Thomas Hadjistavropoulos, W. Smythe. 2001

98 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Management Science and Operations Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0d195982982bd79aa250c7363c83abe74246d366

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. M. Jackson
2. S. Dwyer
3. J. Buckle

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. M. Jackson
2. S. Dwyer
3. J. Buckle

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Maria K. E. Lahman
2. M. Jackson
3. S. Dwyer
4. J. Buckle

Citations in the corpus

• Ethical Issues in the Use of In-Depth Interviews: Literature Review and Discussion (2009, background): “The first were discussion papers: these discussed ethical issues related to in-depth interviews but were not specifically connected to any research study [1-35].”
• Qualitative bereavement research: incongruity between the perspectives of participants and research ethics boards (2010, methodology): “As previously stated, Hadjistavropoulos and Smythe (2001) argue that participants in qualitative research cannot give true informed consent because they do not know how the interview will unfold.”
• A Rose By Any Other Name Is Still a Rose? Problematizing Pseudonyms in Research (2015, background): “This has also been termed third-party issues by Hadjistavropoulos and Smythe (2001) who stated, “The main ethical problem stems from the fact that these individuals did not give consent to have stories about them circulated in this way” (p. 169).”