The Proposal to Lower P Value Thresholds to .005.

By John P. A. Ioannidis. Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), 2018

631 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0ce60740166e4d3d64bc7f44e16096996e888147

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Francesco Sardanelli
2. G. Di Leo

In General Health Professions

1. Francesco Sardanelli
2. G. Di Leo

In Statistics and Probability

1. V. Welty
2. Francesco Sardanelli
3. Jeffrey R. Smith
4. Robert A. Greevy Jr.
5. Jeffrey D. Blume
6. W. Dupont
7. G. Di Leo

Citations in the corpus

• An Introduction to Second-Generation p-Values (2019, background): “…to alter the daily practice of statistics in applied disciplines (e.g., Cristea and Ioannidis 2018). p-Value “improvements” have been limited to revising the threshold for significance (Johnson 2013; Benjamin et al. 2018; Lakens et al. 2018) and tweaking the interpretation (Ioannidis 2018).”
• Statistical significance: p value, 0.05 threshold, and applications to radiomics—reasons for a conservative approach (2020, background): “According to Ioannidis [11], “moving the p-value threshold from .”