What Luck is Not

By Jennifer Lackey. 2008

133 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Philosophy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0cd9019e0958c00d562a280e03d208928a07053b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Duncan Pritchard
2. Andrew Peet
3. Eli Pitcovski

In Philosophy

1. Andrew Peet
2. Eli Pitcovski
3. Duncan Pritchard

Citations in the corpus

• Normal Knowledge: Toward an Explanation-Based Theory of Knowledge (2018, background): “It has been objected to by Neta and Rohrbaugh (2004), Comesaña (2005), Lackey (2006, 2008), Bogardus (2014), and Goldberg (2015).”
• The Modal Account of Luck (2014, background): “(Lackey 2008, §2) Lackey describes Vincent’s discovery of the buried treasure in this case as a “paradigmatic” instance of a lucky event, even though it is clearly not lucky by the lights of the modal account of luck given that Vincent was effectively guaranteed to be successful in finding the…”