Economic impact of the spread of alien species in Germany.

By F. Reinhardt, M. Herlé, F. Bastiansen, B. Streit. 2003

112 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The economic cost of managing invasive species in Australia (2016, methodology): “Data of loss and expenditure were also obtained for New Zealand in 2008 (Giera and Bell 2009), for a few species in Germany in approximately 2002 (Reinhardt et al. 2003), and for 12 species in Sweden in 2006 (Gren et al.”
The Economics of Terrestrial Invasive Species: A Review of the Literature (2006, methodology): “The management of gypsy moth spread in North America is used to illustrate how the methods can be applied in practical situations [see also Sharov and Leibhold (1998) and Sharov, Leibhold, and Roberts (1998)].”
Economics of Harmful Invasive Species: A Review (2014, unknown): “1 [1], 2 [29], 3 [30], 4 [31], 5 [32], 6 [2], 7 [33].”
Biological Flora of the British Isles: Ambrosia artemisiifolia (2015, background): “In addition to its economic impact on crop yields (Reinhardt et al. 2003; Sheppard, Shaw & Sforza 2006), the strongly allergenic pollen of common ragweed causes considerable public health problems in Central and East Europe, and these are becoming increasingly apparent in southern parts of the…”
Biological invaders are threats to human health: an overview (2014, background): “The latter canid species was introduced into Europe from the Far East for its fur, and is a likely source for parasite transmission to humans (REINHARDT et al. 2003), through accidental contact with infected animals or faeces, or through contaminated food or water.”