Task force 1: the changing profile of congenital heart disease in adult life.

By C. Warnes, R. Liberthson, G. Danielson, A. Dore, L. Harris, J. Hoffman, J. Somerville, R. G. Williams, G. Webb. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2001

1,406 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Epidemiology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0c9e18d089fc655e18af10b4c9d6651ab4d9c41d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. R. Ionescu-Ittu
2. A. Mackie
3. Liming Guo
4. N. Dendukuri
5. Mohammed Kaouache
6. S. Kaplan
7. J. Roos‐Hesselink
8. J. Hoffman

Citations in the corpus

• Congenital Heart Defects in the United States: Estimating the Magnitude of the Affected Population in 2010 (2016, neutral): “16,20 Subsequently, Hoffman and colleagues 15 refined these estimates under two extreme scenarios.”
• The incidence of congenital heart disease. (2002, result): “The following classification is similar in many ways to those published previously (109,110), except that late complications and the effects of surgery are not included here.”
• Predictors of pregnancy complications in women with congenital heart disease. (2010, background): “Patients with more complex heart disease need more interventions and are more prone to develop complications outside pregnancy.(19) The burden of pregnancy may accelerate the development of adverse cardiac complications.”
• Lifetime Prevalence of Congenital Heart Disease in the General Population From 2000 to 2010 (2014, background): “In the United States, the 32nd Bethesda Conference estimated that in year 2000, the total number of adults living with CHD in the United States was 800 000.(26) Consistent with these numbers, Canadian data extrapolated to the United States for the year 2000 estimated that for a country population of”