An empirical assessment of assurance statements in sustainability reports: smoke screens or enlightening information?
By A. Gürtürk, Rüdiger Hahn. 2016
164 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0c9282eea624d2349e09daf0e334b559d40bdaa6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Strategy and Management
- Jennifer Martínez‐Ferrero
- Isabel‐María García‐Sánchez
- Christian Klein
- Bernhard Zwergel
- J. Rochell
- Alexander Landau
- Emiliano Ruiz-Barbadillo
- Thomas W. Guenther
Citations in the corpus
- The contents of assurance statements for sustainability reports and information asymmetry (2017, background): “Most research on assurance statements for sustainability reports is descriptive in nature (Ball et al. 2000, O’Dwyer and Owen 2005, Gürtürk and Hahn 2016).”
- Integrated reporting of environmental, social, and governance and financial data: Does the market value integrated reports? (2020, background): “Several studies present evidence for the value relevance of assurance regarding ESG indicators (Brown-Liburd & Zamora, 2015; Cheng et al., 2015; Cuadrado-Ballesteros et al., 2017; García-Sánchez, Hussain, et al., 2019; Gürtürk & Hahn, 2015; Pflugrath et al., 2011).”
- Impact of disclosure and assurance quality of corporate sustainability reports on access to finance (2019, methodology): “Magnan (2014) use legitimacy theory, Jo and Harjoto (2014) use agency and stakeholder framework, Lourenço et al.”