An IRT analysis of motive questionnaires: The Unified Motive Scales

By Felix D. Schönbrodt, F. Gerstenberg. 2012

179 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0c5d62d926ca3371eec6bf1d858885958d7e541f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Marco Perugini
2. Felix D. Schönbrodt
3. Richard P. Bagozzi
4. Utpal M. Dholakia
5. Heesup Han
6. Choong‐Ki Lee
7. G. Haddock
8. G. Maio

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Marco Perugini
2. Felix D. Schönbrodt
3. Daniël Lakens
4. Richard P. Bagozzi
5. Utpal M. Dholakia
6. Heesup Han
7. Ralph Adolphs
8. J. Dubois

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Marco Perugini
2. Felix D. Schönbrodt
3. Richard P. Bagozzi
4. Utpal M. Dholakia
5. Heesup Han
6. Choong‐Ki Lee
7. G. Haddock
8. G. Maio

Citations in the corpus

• At what sample size do correlations stabilize (2013, methodology): “Multiple questionnaire scales have been administered in an open online study (Schönbrodt & Gerstenberg, 2012; Study 3).”
• Testing Fit Patterns with Polynomial Regression Models (2015, methodology): “The explicit intimacy motive (EM) was assessed using a Likert scale (Schönbrodt & Gerstenberg, 2012) ranging from 0 to 5 (M = 3.62, SD = 0.79).”