Historical coevolution of governance and technology in the industrial revolutions

By Nick von Tunzelmann. 2003

178 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract While the relationships between technological change and organisational change have been widely observed in specific cases, little has been done to generalise about such interrelationships over the longer term. The paper uses historical evidence to categorise the principal changes in governance (covering the control, structure and process of systems) in the industrial epoch, which are seen as the successive predominance of markets, (corporate) hierarchies and then networks. These correspond to the successive importance of labour processes, capital processes and information processes. There appears to be a link with the three ‘industrial revolutions’ that have arisen at century-long intervals since the later 18th century, though the causal interrelationships remain uncertain and by no means necessary. Network alignment is suggested as a means for bringing about the coevolution of governance and technology in development processes. A number of mechanisms for matching technological with organisational change are suggested by the governance literature, although no one theory of governance appears able to explain the observed historical phenomena.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0c4ee40761e781245d8cd30c3c4fb9299eabf8df

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

The structure and evolution of industrial clusters: Transactions, technology and knowledge spillovers (2006, background): “Moreover, from the perspective of geography, there is also a fundamental difference in the particular systems of innovation governance (von Tunzelmann, 2003; Moulaert and Sekia, 2003; Simmie et al., 2004) between new and old social networks.”
An evolutionary integrated view of Regional Systems of Innovation: Concepts, measures and historical perspectives (2005, background): “Following von Tunzelmann ( 2003 , 2004 ), each of the conventional modes of governance may be associated with a certain type of failure.”
Institutional reform and technological practice: the case of electricity (2008, background): “27Von Tunzelmann (2003: 371). at B ibliotheek T U D elft on N ovem ber 20, 2014 http://icc.oxfordjournals.org/ D ow nloaded from But still these phases clearly indicate non-continuous changes that can be perceived as different technological paradigms.”