On Some Inequalities for Gaussian Measures
By R. Lata. 2002
60 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0c3e8471c7dbaa709587033c4ce52bd3916d6e73
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Christos Saroglou
- Galyna V. Livshyts
- Arnaud Marsiglietti
- Artem Zvavitch
- Matthieu Fradelizi
- Emanuel Milman
- A. V. Kolesnikov
- Richard J. Gardner
Citations in the corpus
- On the Brunn-Minkowski inequality for general measures with applications to new isoperimetric-type inequalities (2015, background): “It is interesting to note that the case (c) is related to the B-conjecture for Gaussian measures proposed by Banaszczyk (see [19]) and solved by Cordero-Erausquin, Fradelizi, and Maurey (see [8]).”
- Gaussian Brunn-Minkowski inequalities (2010, background): “(Note that what Borell in [5] calls the Brunn-Minkowski inequality for Gauss measure is none of the above inequalities but is rather an isoperimetric inequality that follows from (5); see [22].”
- Remarks on the conjectured log-Brunn–Minkowski inequality (2013, result): “This result is known as the (B)-Theorem (conjectured by Banaszczyk, see [8]).”
- More on logarithmic sums of convex bodies (2014, background): “This was previously conjectured by Banaszczyk in [29] for the standard Gaussian measure γn (i.”
- Log-Concavity and Strong Log-Concavity: a review (2014, background): “It was proved independently by a number of mathematicians at about the same time: these include Prékopa (1971, 1973), building on Borell (1974, 1975); Brascamp and Lieb (1974, 1975, 1976); Dinghas (1957), and Rinott (1976).”
- The (B) conjecture for the Gaussian measure of dilates of symmetric convex sets and related problems (2004, background): “holds for every a, b > 0? Using a deep result of LataÃla and Oleszkiewicz [13] on the rate of growth of the Gaussian measure of dilates of symmetric convex sets, LataÃla [14] noticed that (1) holds if γ(aK), γ(bK) ≥ 0.”