Linking Genetics and Political Attitudes: Reconceptualizing Political Ideology

By Kevin B. Smith, Douglas R. Oxley, Matthew V. Hibbing, J. Alford, John R. Hibbing. 2011

152 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0c3d12b32552eed056a79f9019097b4a523a86c9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

1. H. Nam
2. John T. Jost
3. David M. Amodio
4. Jay J. Van Bavel
5. John R. Hibbing
6. J. Alford
7. Kevin B. Smith
8. C. Funk

In Sociology and Political Science

1. John T. Jost
2. H. Nam
3. Jay J. Van Bavel
4. David M. Amodio
5. John R. Hibbing
6. Matthew V. Hibbing
7. J. Alford
8. Kevin B. Smith

Citations in the corpus

• Genetic and Environmental Transmission of Political Orientations (2013, methodology): “tradition—an egalitarianism index (Feldman & Steenbergen, 2001) and the society works best index (Smith et al., 2011).”
• Political Neuroscience: The Beginning of a Beautiful Friendship (2014, background): “…evaluative associations—reveals that conservatives exhibit preferences for stability , tradition , duty , and command , whereas liberals exhibit preferences for opposite values , such as flexibility , progress , compromise , diversity , and feminism ( Jost , Nosek , & Gosling , 2008 ; Smith et al .”