The Rate and Molecular Spectrum of Spontaneous Mutations in Arabidopsis thaliana

By Stephan Ossowski, Korbinian Schneeberger, J. I. Lucas-Lledó, Norman Warthmann, Richard M. Clark, R. Shaw, Detlef Weigel, Michael Lynch. Science, 2010

1,123 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Evolution in Action Rates of evolution in gene and genome sequences have been estimated, but these estimates are subject to error because many of the steps of evolution over the ages are not directly measurable or are hidden under subsequent changes. Ossowski et al. (p. 92) now provide a more accurate measurement of how often spontaneous mutations arise in a nuclear genome. Mutations arising over 30 generations were compared by sequencing DNA from individual Arabidopsis thaliana plants. UV- and deamination-induced mutagenesis appeared to bias the type of mutations found. Rapid sequencing technologies allow a more accurate calculation of the mutation rate for plants. To take complete advantage of information on within-species polymorphism and divergence from close relatives, one needs to know the rate and the molecular spectrum of spontaneous mutations. To this end, we have searched for de novo spontaneous mutations in the complete nuclear genomes of five Arabidopsis thaliana mutation accumulation lines that had been maintained by single-seed descent for 30 generations. We identified and validated 99 base substitutions and 17 small and large insertions and deletions. Our results imply a spontaneous mutation rate of 7 × 10−9 base substitutions per site per generation, the majority of which are G:C→A:T transitions. We explain this very biased spectrum of base substitution mutations as a result of two main processes: deamination of methylated cytosines and ultraviolet light–induced mutagenesis.

Subfields: Genetics, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0c33ff931947022c5aa9076a4c85ebd5f3b0d664

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

  1. Oliver Stegle
  2. Brandon S. Gaut
  3. Arthur Korte
  4. Ashley Farlow
  5. Angela M. Hancock
  6. C. Alonso‐Blanco
  7. F. Picó
  8. Michael Lynch

In Plant Science

  1. Stephan Ossowski
  2. Noah Fahlgren
  3. Detlef Weigel
  4. J. Cuperus
  5. James C. Carrington
  6. F. Picó
  7. C. Alonso‐Blanco
  8. Todd P. Michael

Citations in the corpus