Quantitative Seismic Interpretation: Applying Rock Physics Tools to Reduce Interpretation Risk

By P. Avseth, Tapan Mukerji, G. Mavko. 2005

771 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0c32bf6e6fa4b7ed20edb69282e357310b262dd6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. M. Bosch
2. Tapan Mukerji
3. E. González
4. Benjamin Gosselin-Cliche
5. Bernard Giroux
6. Niklas Linde
7. Dario Grana

Citations in the corpus

• Seismic inversion for reservoir properties combining statistical rock physics and geostatistics: A review (2010, methodology): “The fourth step in the complete formulation of statistical rock hysics Mukerji et al., 2001a; Avseth et al., 2005 includes applying eostatistical stochastic simulation for imposing spatial correlation. he probabilities obtained in step 3 from classifying seismic atributes depend on the local voxel…”
• 3D frequency-domain finite-difference viscoelastic-wave modeling using weighted average 27-point operators with optimal coefficients (2014, background): “Quantitative interpretation of seismic data has been gaining popularity in recent years (Avseth et al., 2005).”