HIV/AIDS-related stigma and discrimination: a conceptual framework and implications for action

By R. Parker, P. Aggleton. 2002

2,658 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0c291ec4041a5bac86ccd55b00d2c1a1e0e46a5c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Modified social ecological model: a tool to guide the assessment of the risks and risk contexts of HIV epidemics (2013, background): “While there is no singular definition, structural drivers can be conceptualized as those social, economic, organizational, and political power and domination factors which contribute to social inequities [2-4].”
The social structural production of HIV risk among injecting drug users. (2005, background): “This in turn highlights the effect of stigma and discrimination against IDUs (and other vulnerable populations) in reproducing dominant relations of power by quashing social difference (Parker & Aggleton, 2003).”
Culture and stigma: adding moral experience to stigma theory. (2007, background): “Parker and Aggleton (2003) draw from the work of”
Structural competency: Theorizing a new medical engagement with stigma and inequality (2014, background): “” Parker and Aggleton (2003) further link the concept of structural causation to the concept of stigma.”
The fight against stigma: An overview of stigma-reduction strategies and interventions (2006, unknown): “Parker and Aggleton (2003) argue that stigma must be regarded as a social process in which people out of fear of the disease want to maintain social control by contrasting those who are normal with those who are different.”
Smoking, Stigma and Social Class (2011, background): “Social inequalities figure prominently among these preconditions (Link and Phelan, 2001; Parker and Aggleton, 2003).”
Structural Stigma and the Health of Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Populations (2014, background): “Despite these significant advancements, stigma research has been criticized for being too individually focused and for overlooking broader macrosocial forms of stigma that powerfully affect the lives of the stigmatized (Link & Phelan, 2001; Parker & Aggleton, 2003).”
Stigma: Advances in Theory and Research (2013, background): “Power differences are essential for the production of stigma (Parker & Aggleton, 2003).”
Correlates and consequences of internalized stigma for people living with mental illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (2010, background): “…have paid greater attention to the socio-cultural processes and structures that sustain stigma, as well as the factors (including features of the disease) that produce variability in how it is experienced and expressed (Herek, 2007; Parker & Aggleton, 2003; Scambler, 2009; Weiss et al., 2006).”
Stigma and prejudice: one animal or two? (2008, background): “Column 6 also includes such outcomes for perpetrators, because as suggested by models emphasizing conflict and domination (Feagin, 2000; Parker & Aggleton, 2003), when targets lose in terms of outcomes such as work, housing, and income, perpetrators gain.”