Gains and Losses from Regional Trading Agreements: A Survey

By P. Lloyd, D. Maclaren. 2004

143 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0c1e1df27f748f3b658410bcf86b84dab283e4c8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Jon C. W. Pevehouse
2. Edward D. Mansfield
3. Helen V. Milner
4. M. Plummer
5. P. Petri
6. Bala Veeramacheneni
7. E. Ekanayake
8. Amit Mukherjee

In Strategy and Management

1. P. Petri
2. M. Plummer
3. F. Zhai
4. Edward D. Mansfield
5. Helen V. Milner
6. Yoram Z. Haftel

Citations in the corpus

• The Trans-Pacific Partnership and Asia-Pacific Integration: A Quantitative Assessment (2012, background): “Trade diversion harms the importer, which now buys costlier regional products, and the exporter, which suffers deterioration in terms of trade (Lloyd and Maclaren 2004).”
• Democracy, Veto Players and the Depth of Regional Integration (2008, background): “…literature exists on the economic consequences of integration arrangements (e.g. Lipsey, 1960; de Melo and Panagariya, 1993; Baldwin and Venables, 1995; Bhagwati and Panagariya, 1996; Krueger, 1997; Krishna et al., 1999; Freund, 2000; Panagariya, 2000; Venables, 2003; Lloyd and MacLaren, 2004).”
• Trade Blocks and the Gravity Model: A Study of Economic Integration among Asian Developing Countries (2010, background): “…literature review, the reader is directed to any of a number of surveys of various approaches to the study of RTAs, including Panagariya (1999, 2000), DeRosa (1998), Harrison, Rutherford and Tarr (2003), Robinson and Thierfelder (2002), Scollay and Gilbert (2000), and Lloyd and MacLaren (2004).”