The Structure of Economic Modeling of the Potential Impacts of Climate Change: Grafting Gross Underestimation of Risk onto Already Narrow Science Models

By N. Stern. 2013

524 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Scientists describe the scale of the risks from unmanaged climate change as potentially immense. However, the scientific models, because they omit key factors that are hard to capture precisely, appear to substantially underestimate these risks. Many economic models add further gross underassessment of risk because the assumptions built into the economic modeling on growth, damages and risks, come close to assuming directly that the impacts and costs will be modest and close to excluding the possibility of catastrophic outcomes. A new generation of models is needed in all three of climate science, impact and economics with a still stronger focus on lives and livelihoods, including the risks of large-scale migration and conflicts.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0c05f9b4e3a2d0bac83b908be713a8f7e23afc29

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

  1. Richard S. J. Tol
  2. Delavane Diaz
  3. Cameron Hepburn
  4. I. Monasterolo
  5. Zhimin Huang
  6. Stéphane Hallegatte
  7. Alexander Teytelboym
  8. Andrea Roventini

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

  1. John P. Weyant
  2. Delavane Diaz
  3. F. Moore
  4. Christian Gollier
  5. Simon Dietz
  6. Louise Kessler
  7. Stéphane Hallegatte
  8. Alexander Teytelboym

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

  1. Cameron Hepburn
  2. Alexander Teytelboym
  3. Richard S. J. Tol
  4. John P. Weyant
  5. Zhifu Mi
  6. Philippe Aghion
  7. F. Venmans
  8. Simon Dietz

Citations in the corpus