UMI-tools: Modelling sequencing errors in Unique Molecular Identifiers to improve quantification accuracy

By Tom S. Smith, Andreas Heger, Ian M. Sudbery. bioRxiv, 2016

1,542 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Unique Molecular Identifiers (UMIs) are random oligonucleotide barcodes that are increasingly used in high-throughout sequencing experiments. Through a UMI, identical copies arising from distinct molecules can be distinguished from those arising through PCR amplification of the same molecule. However, bioinformatic methods to leverage the information from UMIs have yet to be formalised. In particular, sequencing errors in the UMI sequence are often ignored, or else resolved in an ad-hoc manner. We show that errors in the UMI sequence are common and introduce network-based methods to account for these errors when identifying PCR duplicates. Using these methods, we demonstrate improved quantification accuracy both under simulated conditions and real iCLIP and single cell RNA-Seq datasets. Reproducibility between iCLIP replicates and single cell RNA-Seq clustering are both improved using our proposed network-based method, demonstrating the value of properly accounting for errors in UMIs. These methods are implemented in the open source UMI-tools software package (https://github.com/CGATOxford/UMI-tools).

Subfields: Cancer Research, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0bb5b7afb729814693eeff9beabf08344b65ed90

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cancer Research

  1. Aviv Regev
  2. Lawrence Loeb
  3. Johan L. M. Björkegren
  4. Li-Ming Gan
  5. J. Salk
  6. Michael W. Schmitt
  7. Oscar Franzén
  8. Jason D. Buenrostro

In Molecular Biology

  1. Caleb A. Lareau
  2. Jiarui Ding
  3. Aviv Regev
  4. Lawrence Loeb
  5. Johan L. M. Björkegren
  6. Li-Ming Gan
  7. Oscar Franzén
  8. Jason D. Buenrostro

Citations in the corpus