Resource Selection and Spatial Separation of Mule Deer and Elk during Spring

By B. Johnson, John W. Kern, M. Wisdom, Scott L. Findholt, J. Kie. 2000

145 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0bb23e6a92bfd9f24e31fea61dc7a2ab01ed7a65

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. J. Kie
2. R. Terry Bowyer
3. Ryan A. Long
4. E. J. Taylor
5. K. Monteith
6. A. Ager
7. Mark A. Hurley
8. C. Anderson

Citations in the corpus

• Niche partitioning among mule deer, elk, and cattle: Do stable isotopes reflect dietary niche? (2003, background): “Other studies have noted that mule deer occupied more xeric habitats, characterized by ponderosa pine overstory with an elk sedge dominated understory, than those habitats used by elk or cattle (Johnson & Clausnitzer, 1992; Johnson et al., 2000; Coe et al., 2001; Stewart et al., 2002).”
• Habitat selection by mule deer during migration: effects of landscape structure and natural-gas development (2012, background): “Mule deer demonstrate strong avoidance of elk (Johnson et al. 2000, Stewart et al. 2002, Long et al. 2008, Stewart et al. 2010), and elk occur in large herds throughout the Piceance Basin (White et al. 2001).”
• DAILY AND SEASONAL MOVEMENTS AND HABITAT USE BY FEMALE ROCKY MOUNTAIN ELK AND MULE DEER (2003, methodology): “—Animal locations were determined by an automated telemetry system using retransmitted LORAN-C radionavigation signals (Dana et al. 1989; Findholt et al. 1996; Johnson et al. 2000; Rowland et al. 1997).”
• Modeling animal movements using stochastic differential equations (2004, background): “Johnson et al. (2000) and Ager et al. (in press) have shown large differences in the patterns of habitat use by elk over these two periods.”
• Behavior and nutritional condition buffer a large‐bodied endotherm against direct and indirect effects of climate (2014, background): “…et al. 2010), population dynamics (Mysterud et al. 2001, Chan et al. 2005, Post et al. 2009), and timing of life-history events (Bowyer et al. 1999, Stenseth and Mysterud 2002, Winkler et al. 2002, Monteith et al. 2011) of a variety of species are, or will be, affected by climatic variability.”
• Resource Selection and Movements by Female Mule Deer Odocoileus hemionus: Effects of Reproductive Stage (2009, methodology): “Adult female elk Cervus elaphus also were captured and fitted with GPS collars during 2005 and 2006 to account for the effects of elk on resource selection bymule deer (Johnson et al. 2000, Stewart et al. 2002, 2006).”
• Study Designs and Tests for Comparing Resource Use and Availability II (2006, methodology): “Johnson et al. (2000) used logistic regression across animals but jackknifed the analysis on animals by dropping out one animal at a time to look at the significance among the pool of coefficients.”
• Dry season diets of sympatric ungulates in lowland Nepal: competition and facilitation in alluvial tall grasslands (2006, background): “Many studies on food interactions among sympatric ungulates have already been carried out in temperate and Afro-tropical large mammal assemblages (VeseyFitzgerald 1960; Gwynne and Bell 1968; Bell 1970; McNaughton 1979; Jarman and Sinclair 1979; Jenkins and Wright 1988; Gordon and Illius 1989; Putman”