Contradicting Geometrical Concepts in Pore Size Analysis Attained with Electron Microscopy and Mercury Intrusion
By Beat Münch, L. Holzer. 2008
427 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Materials Chemistry, Mechanical Engineering, Surfaces, Coatings and Films
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0baab696346fe96c65185a1b2cb2bc9af977e9eb
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Materials Chemistry
In Mechanical Engineering
In Surfaces, Coatings and Films
Citations in the corpus
- Tortuosity of porous media: Image analysis and physical simulation (2021, neutral): “…specific surface area (Petersen et al., 1996), correlation functions (Adler et al., 1990; Coker et al., 1996; Hilfer, 2002), pore size distribution (Münch and Holzer, 2008), Minkowski functionals (Vogel et al., 2010; Arm-strong et al., 2019), constrictivity (Holzer et al., 2013; Keller et al.,…”
- Estimation of geodesic tortuosity and constrictivity in stationary random closed sets (2018, methodology): “…to complex microstructures (Holzer et al., 2013), that is, rmin and rmax are defined for complex microstructures based on the concept of the continuous pore size distribution (Münch & Holzer, 2008), which is directly related to the granulometry function of mathematical morphology (Matheron, 1975).”
- Using X-ray computed tomography in pore structure characterization for a Berea sandstone: Resolution effect (2012, background): “Pore surface area, pore size distribution (PSD), and pore connectivity can be deduced from nitrogen adsorption–desorption curves (Barret et al., 1951; Seaton et al., 1989) or mercury intrusion–extrusion curves (Murray et al., 1999).”