The Politics of Digital Agricultural Technologies: A Preliminary Review
By Sarah Rotz, Emily Duncan, Matthew Small, Janos V. Botschner, R. Dara, Ian Mosby, M. Reed, Evan D. G. Fraser. Sociologia Ruralis, 2019
355 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Digital technologies are being developed and adopted across the agro‐food system, from farm to fork. Within decision‐making spaces, however, little attention is being paid to political factors arising from such technological developments. This review draws from critical social sciences to examine emerging technologies and big data systems in agriculture and assesses some key issues arising in the field. We begin with an introduction and review of the so‐called ‘digital revolution’ and then briefly outline how political economy is effective for understanding major challenges for governing technologies and data systems in agriculture. These challenges include: (1) data ownership and control, (2) the production of technologies and data development, and (3) data security. We then use literature and examples to consider the extent to which the political and economic landscape can be shifted to support greater equity in agriculture, while reflecting on structural challenges and limits. In doing so, we emphasise that while there are significant systemic tensions between digital ag‐tech development and agroecological approaches, we do not see them as mutually exclusive per se. This article intends to provide decision‐makers, practitioners and scholars from a wide range of disciplines with a timely assessment of agro‐food digitalisation that attends to political economic factors. In doing so, this article contributes to policy and decision‐making discussions, which, from our perspective, continue to be rather technocentric in nature while paying little attention to how digital technologies can support agroecological systems specifically.
Subfields: Ecology, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0b99bedfa3d27ce02d860b2bb7dff9ab748b0fef
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
In Plant Science
Citations in the corpus
- Dealing with the game-changing technologies of Agriculture 4.0: How do we manage diversity and responsibility in food system transition pathways? (2020, neutral): “…and advisors as the nature of rural employment changes and there is a decrease in demand for these jobs or they require considerable reskilling (Rotz et al., 2019a, Rotz et al., 2019; Eastwood et al., 2019), and the welfare implications for animals are important to understand (Bear and…”
- Digital transformation of agriculture and rural areas: A socio-cyber-physical system framework to support responsibilisation (2021, background): “Bearing in mind that different social and technological configurations, also referred to as ’ socio-technical bundles (Barrett et al., 2020), may lead to a different distribution of impacts on stakeholders (Klerkx and Rose, 2020; Rotz et al., 2019a).”