Research at DERA on sub boundary layer vortex generators (SBVGs)

By P. Ashill, J. Fulker, K. Hackett. 2001

144 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Aerospace Engineering, Atmospheric Science, Computational Mechanics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0b916b851f7e611bd128e3d18e76db3bc31e78c7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aerospace Engineering

1. B. W. van Oudheusden
2. R. Humble
3. P. Blinde
4. John C. H. Lin
5. Fulvio Scarano
6. Bernhard Wieneke
7. J. Schneiders
8. Andreas Schröder

In Atmospheric Science

1. Fulvio Scarano
2. B. W. van Oudheusden
3. John C. H. Lin
4. Markus Raffel

In Computational Mechanics

1. B. W. van Oudheusden
2. Fulvio Scarano
3. R. Humble
4. P. Blinde
5. John C. H. Lin
6. Bernhard Wieneke
7. G. Elsinga
8. J. Schneiders

Citations in the corpus

• Effects of micro-ramps on a shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction (2009, background): “Although experimental studies (see [15,16]) suggest that vane-type SBVGs may be more effective in suppressing separation, micro-ramps offer the advantage of being more rugged, therefore less subject to mechanical failure, which is essential for engine intake applications.”
• Review of research on low-profile vortex generators to control boundary-layer separation (2002, methodology): “A framework is suggested in [20] for generalizing the correlation of nondimensional circulation through using the concept of Passive cavity”