Artificial neural networks: A new method for mineral prospectivity mapping
By Warick Brown, Tom Gedeon, D. Groves, R. Barnes. 2000
321 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Environmental Engineering, Mechanical Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0b8455292b1729eec5e62cd7724c0a56d21cabaa
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
In Environmental Engineering
Citations in the corpus
- Random forest predictive modeling of mineral prospectivity with small number of prospects and data with missing values in Abra (Philippines) (2015, unknown): “…Carranza and Hale, 2001; Harris et al., 2001, 2006; Mejía-Herrera et al., 2014) and (ii) artificial neural networks (Singer and Kouda, 1996, 1999; Brown et al., 2000, 2003a,b; Harris et al., 2003; Porwal et al., 2003, 2004; Rigol-Sanchez et al., 2003; Skabar, 2005; Behnia, 2007; Nykänen, 2008;…”
- Machine learning predictive models for mineral prospectivity: an evaluation of neural networks, random forest, regression trees and support vector machines (2015, background): “, 1984), artificial neural networks (ANNs) (Brown et al., 2000; Porwal et al., 2003; Rigol-Sanchez et al., 2003; Rumelhart et al., 1986), support vector machines (SVMs) (Abedi et al.”
- Basic Tenets of Classification Algorithms K-Nearest-Neighbor, Support Vector Machine, Random Forest and Neural Network: A Review (2020, methodology): “Larger input datasets will lengthen classification times for NN more than for SVM and RF [4].”