Making the IMF and the World Bank more Accountable

By N. Woods. 2001

241 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0b8269a788bfadff494bf11d13eac54a14aba3c7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Development

Citations in the corpus

IMF program compliance: Aggregate index versus policy specific research strategies (2006, background): “Eichengreen (1999), Eldar (2005), Kapur (2000), Krueger (2006), Meltzer (2006), Meltzer Commission (2000), Peet (2003), Sachs (2004), Singh (1999), Stiglitz (2003), Willett (2001), Woods (2005) .”
Corporate Governance at the World Bank and the Dilemma of Global Governance (2010, background): “Each member country is required to purchase a certain number of shares based on a formula that accounts for its weight in the world economy (Woods 2001).”
Governance and the Limits of Accountability: The WTO, the IMF, and the World Bank (2001, background): “In respect of the IMF and the World Bank these presumptions have been examined elsewhere revealing significant weaknesses in each ( Woods 2001 ).”
What Is Transparency? (2009, methodology): “The use of the word spread to the World Bank’s policies (Woods 2001),3 to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) conventions (2001a, 2001b, 2002), and to congressional directives to the International Monetary Fund (Toby McIntosh, as cited by Roberts 2006, 187).”
The crisis of neoliberalism and the future of international institutions: A comparison of the IMF and the WTO (2009, background): “…D.C.; the practice of dominant states of coordinating their position at G-8 meetings before they present them at the IMF; and the tendency of other major shareholders (e.g., Britain, Japan) to follow the U.S. lead when major decisions are being made (Buira 2005; Woods 2005; Babb and Buira 2005).”